Public statements about AI and jobs, scored for cope. How labs and commentators frame displacement evidence.
LUCID ≤25 PARTIAL ≤35 MODERATE ≤50 HEAVY COPE ≤70 TERMINAL COPIUM >70
Displacement data framed as adoption. "Doing" presented as a feature. Geographic concentration called "global reach." The word "displacement" never appears.
Measured unemployment (lagging indicator) instead of hiring rates (leading indicator). Found hiring slowdowns but headlined the unemployment non-finding. Better than OpenAI but still cope.
Zero published displacement data. Unfalsifiable "new jobs" claim. Refuses to measure what OpenAI and Anthropic at least attempted.
The Volume Illusion. 31% of an exponentially growing base = MORE absolute work displacement than 51% in 2024.
165 work activities measured being automated. Zero data on new jobs. Unfalsifiable cope.
46% of work messages are "doing." Only 34% are "asking." OpenAI's own data demolishes this.
True short-term. But productivity gains with a tool that works independently makes the human the bottleneck, then the overhead, then redundant.
Collapses when the "complement" performs 46% of work tasks independently. A complement assists. A substitute replaces. Doing = substitute.
This section will expand as labs publish more data and commentators respond. Every statement gets scored.